The Paper Rebellion: Part II

The second in a series discussing a very possible future scenario.

In part one I outlined the possible scenario of an attack on the domestic use of paper to force all of recorded history onto the cloud. I discussed how with currently available technology all of this data could then be sanitised by AI and retrospectively contextualised to suit the narratives of globalist think tanks. The desired effect? the fomenting of a situation where all information is under the editorial command of the undeserving, perversely minded few. This scenario would place the only remaining medium of information, paper, under the kosh. You see, a “copy” of Jame Joyces Ulysses on that version of the net would contain a very different tone and use of language than the one sitting on your shelf. The one on your shelf could instil negative/illegal gender stereotypes after all. The horror.

Cissy's quick motherwit guessed what was amiss and she whispered to Edy Boardman to take him there behind the pushcar where the gentlemen couldn't see and to mind he didn't wet his new tan shoes.

Cissy's quick personwit guessed what was amiss and they whispered to Edy Boardman to take them there behind the pushcar where the people couldn't see and to mind they didn't wet their new tan shoes.

Rather than the characters discussing topics such as nationalism and ethnicity openly and candidly, the language used by Joyce, even in the generously liberal viewpoint that it is presented in, would be replaced by unbearably infantilised teachable moments designed to denigrate the Irish entirely. Bloom becoming an overweight lesbian of color is on the cards unfortunately and It won’t end there. Ulysses, as the guinea pig in this hypo-thesis, would be even further besmirched under such measures. The challenging ideas contained within Ulysses, already progressive and liberal in nature, would go supernova. I would wager though that Ulysses would be far too thought provoking and intricate for them to even try it. It is likely that books such as Ulysses in its original form would simply vanish from the market. A new Ulysses will likely be written in it’s place in such a scenario. Other books would be less resisiliant. Books such as JK. Rowling’s Harry Potter series, contain a more straightforward version of English that AI could dance through quite easily as it sanitises it for the new world.

As it stands we are being subjected to micro doses of this through social media. Our every utterance is already subjected to the scrutiny of AI bots that flag and remove posts automatically in near enough real time. Social media giants such as Twitter/X, Facebook and Instagram command 84% of the social media traffic. Combine this fact with the statistics around worldwide communication, which is 65% digital versus 35% offline, rising to 90% during the pandemic and you have yourself a monopoly on the truth. X has thankfully shifted back to an “on-prem” model but you can be assured that a constitutional battle of the ages is brewing over the “right” to hold user data locally, on privately owned servers. More than likely, regulation is being drafted up as we speak to separate the service providers and the data because of some great cyberthreat boogeyman. Facebook uses Amazon Web Services, a cloud service that holds 33% of the entire cloud market. Facebook holds 67% of all social media traffic. It is already entirely possible, at least in the case of Facebook, for Amazon to implement a policy of data-hygiene on it’s cloud service and strangle 67%(facebooks market share) of the total 65% of world communication in general. Ladies and gentlemen, that leaves us at a total of 43.5% percent of all communication Globally. They need to get this figure far higher before they can close the door behind us but that is a startling realisation to know that we are already that far down the slippery slope. The real figure is even higher when you consider that I have only provided you with one company on one cloud service to reach that percentage.

Fake Origin Story

I have mentioned AWS above as have having 33% of the cloud market share. Amazon originally started out as an online bookshop as you already might be aware of. But did you know that Amazon now commands 50% of global book sales? Research shows some startling figures beyond this. Amazon holds 67% of the global E-book market, all of which is stored on it’s Amazon Web Service. That’s right, 43.5% of off global communication and 67% of its literature are under the command of one man, Jeff Bezos. Bezos, as you have been told, was just some geek who built this book empire from a dingy office and an old door as a desk but the truth is far more sinister. Bezos’s maternal Grandfather was none other than Laurence Preston Gise. Who was Gise when he was at home? Only the head of the Atomic Energy Commission, in charge of various space and weapons programs along the way. having held a number of high ranking Federal Positions, Gise would have retired a multi millionaire and had one of the highest level security clearances in the country. This was in the years immediately following Oppenheimer’s atomic breakthrough in Los Alimos, through the cold war period and up to preparation stages of Apollo 11. He was over the entire thing. All 26,000 employees from the seven-state program, which included the Los Alamos Nuclear laboratory, were under the auspices of the Atomic Energy Commission and they reported to this guy. Jeff Bezos being his grandchild and ending up at the reigns of a company with half of the internet on his hard drive, is under no circumstances a fluke. Bezos is their man. Under the Trump administration, Bezos was denied the contract for JEDI, a 10 billion dollar contract from the Pentagon for Cloud based wartime solutions. This program was held up until Genocide-Joe took the reigns and now Microsoft, Oracle, Google and Amazon have been cut in on the deal, which is now under the title of Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability (JWCC). Cloud data monopoly, plus Pentagon defence spending equals hard times ahead.

One of the major indicators of the onset of war is the narrowing of civil liberties, particularly surrounding the free flow of information. The original ‘Ministry of Truth’, Britain’s War Propaganda Bureau, was set up in 1914 in response to WW1. Britain’s top writers were brought in to secretly propagandise their own people into becoming war minded and patriotic.

“The Bureau began its propaganda campaign on 2 September 1914 when Masterman invited 25 leading British authors to Wellington House to discuss ways of best promoting Britain's interests during the war. Those who attended included William Archer, Hall Caine, Arthur Conan Doyle, Arnold Bennett, John Masefield, G. K. Chesterton, Henry Newbolt, John Galsworthy, Thomas Hardy, Gilbert Parker, G. M. Trevelyan and H. G. Wells.^[2] Rudyard Kipling had been invited to the meeting but was unable to attend.”

View the full wiki entry here

Death, Brought to you by the Bureau of Propaganda

They convinced their people, and sadly an awful lot of Irish, to die in the fields of mainland Europe using pamphlets, novels, publications in the media and posters. You can view some of the propaganda here. During this time they also compromised the news media. The owners and editors of all the major papers were absorbed into the Ministry of Information. Almost the entire food chain of information at that time was controlled by the British government.

“In early 1918 it was decided that a senior government figure should take over responsibility for propaganda and on 4 March Lord Beaverbrook, owner of the Daily Express newspaper, was made Minister of Information. Masterman was placed beneath him as Director of Publications, and John Buchan as Director of Intelligence. Lord Northcliffe, owner of The Times and the Daily Mail, was put in charge of propaganda aimed at enemy nations, while Robert Donald, editor of the Daily Chronicle, was made director of propaganda aimed at neutral nations. Following the announcement, in February 1918, Lloyd George was accused of creating this new system to gain control over Fleet Street's leading figures.”

View the full wiki entry here

This capture of the news media was plainly visible all the way down to the local publications which maintained, and still claim to this day, to be independent. You can trace similar lines from the EU and the UK, through our own government here in Ireland down through the layers of national and local media. This is something I will cover also in Part III, but for now I want to draw your attention to something incredible about the Propaganda Bureau of WW1 Britain. In 1914, a 10 year old boy by the name of Eric Blair wrote a poem about the cowardice of Englishmen should they fail to join the war effort and had it published in a local paper called Henley and South Oxfordshire Standard. This paper is still operating today under the name of The Henley Standard.

Eric Blair is a name some of you might know already, for those that don’t, Eric Blair is none other than George Orwell. Orwell went on to write the famous non-fiction novel, 1984, published in 1949. It is clear that Orwell’s inspiration for 1984 came from his time employed within the Bureau. Orwell was a typical rebel in his younger days, rejecting the rigid expectations of academia, yet he secured a place the prestigious schools of Wellington and Eton respectively. He did this despite routinely performing terribly at his studies. He was clearly rewarded with the Eton scholarship for his work within the Bureau and likely during his time within both academic and clandestine institutions he developed his his Philosophy. He was, after all, privy to the type of discussions that led to creation of the modern surveillance state that he went on to predict with insane accuracy. Strangely enough, so too did his wife work within the Ministry of information during the second world war in its censorship division. It is widely accepted that Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning to us all against the totalitarian regimes that were being assembled on both the right and the left. He was in part an architect of these ideas within British establishment and his warnings to us must be heeded.

The comparisons made between George Orwell’s 1984 and todays western society have become more frequent and are at stage where we are at maximum saturation. We have entire battalions of boomers, old school lefty’s of yesteryear, Orwell-posting almost on the daily. The younger breed of libertarians, myself included, are far more technologically aware and because of this, a new soothsayer has emerged. The average Millennial, commonly ridiculed for his part in crafting this hellscape, has begun to pump the brakes on modernity. My generation witnessed the transition from freedom to tyranny and we have identified big data as a threat among threats. Because of our experiences between 2001 and now, because of the trajectory we are on, we are looking to the future through the lens of Orwell. Now that we are here in the middle of Orwell’s prediction, we are standing on the horizon he once gazed at through his minds eye. We can see beyond it, watching the machinations of a post-Orwell society coming towards us and we can hear him asking us:

What is it, what can you see!?


Part III coming soon …