The Paper Rebellion: I
The first of a series discussing a very possible future scenario.
In the last few days and weeks the general public has been made aware of the genocidal removal of white Europeans from search results and AI generated content through algorithms and engines such as Chrome, but in particular, Google’s Gemini. The Gemini Scandal, as it is now known, has brought the full scale of the pervasiveness of obscure Critical Race Theory in the source code into the public discourse. When terms like “Vikings” or “white people” were entered into its interface, Gemini would return what can only be described as Afrocentric imagery. This form of race equity, not equality, clearly is the result of an antagonistic policy within Google that may be laughed off by some as the work of a rogue Marxist intern but the reality is that CRT is now part of every corporate decision across the developed world. This is absolutely the work of hundreds of people who want to bring race equity into every interaction you have on the net. Hilariously, this failed equality of outcome attempt may become the case study that defeats this madness but there are far more interesting connotations to discuss here.
This development is a demonstration of the capabilities of modern technology, only one of hundreds of such examples of how this could be used to alienate a subset of society such as whites. The real danger is its ability to alienate society as a whole from its history. This technology has the power to interfere with the perceptions we hold of our history and cultural norms. The simultaneous replacement of cherished historical western figures with African, middle eastern and oriental actors in modern cinema and TV is no coincidence. Combine this with Google AI replacing us in real time and you have a real problem. As it stands these attacks against white European history, which originally began as memes and delusional TikToks etc, have evolved into other forms of attacks on our identity. Statues of political figures of our past are being pulled down. National monuments and imagery are being defaced and trivialised. Our true history, the history of the human race as whole, is now at a point of fatal revisionism where there is only one thing holding us in place in terms of historical accuracy. Paper.
Books, records, maps, art and the printing press are dangling tediously over the edge of this cliff that seems to have suddenly appeared infront of the human race as we get pushed towards it by Technocracy. Authoritarianism, a product of the compulsion of the few to rule over the many, has licked its lips and rubbed its hands as Moor’s Law brought us from libraries to cloud storage, dial up to 5g, and now to this point in history where in every home we have internet enabled devices that have cameras and microphones. Terms of use have morphed from “you must return this book” into entire dissertations about biometric data, voice templates, facial recognitions and even the right review your private content. In some cases, Google has even taken measures to “suggest” language to the authors of documents on its servers in order to make their writings “more inclusive”. Let me be frank about this, the only thing stopping Google or one of their few competitors from mandating these changes is the fact that we have options. The competition in the cloud service market combined with the fact we still have physical storage on our smart devices allows us to write what we want and share this pure form of expression with others. This vector of freedom of consciousness is a threat to the desired model of the state obtaining/retaining editorial control over our content and will likely come under attack in the very near future. Laws such as the embattled Hate Speech Bill and Digital Services Act could be used as a green light by these corporations, who more than likely helped create these laws in the first place, to implement such an Orwellian measure.
If the smart device market transitions into a cloud-only model where we do not have the leverage of physical storage or offline modes, which google already demonstrated it could do with Google Stadia, we will be placed into a situation where we will be subjected to these real-time book burnings as a standard term of use. At this moment, which could easily be within the next decade, we will have a situation where the only medium that will permit free expression will be paper. In light of this scenario ask yourself this question:
How long will it be before using paper, and its associated paraphernalia ( the common pen) , becomes stigmatised, stealth taxed, conspicuously taxed and eventually legislated out of our grasp?
If paper becomes the last means of documenting history, telling our story, expressing ourselves in the context of the time and in the way we desire to express it, are we prepared to fight for it? Are we prepared to rise above the the propaganda that will come our way when we are threated with that reality? Are we capable of understanding the danger of that scenario and identifying it at a societal level? I am uncertain as it stands that Joe Normie is able to comprehend the level of insanity that is about to befall us if this agenda advances any further. As with Covid-19 “health measures” the willingness to comply, initially, will be the silver bullet to digital freedoms. With this particular scenario, there will be no ability to recover our position as we had with Covid. The moment we lose physical storage ( ownership of data) and transition to cloud-only (Data as a service) we will be severely disadvantaged in terms of resisting totalitarianism. The masses, already consumerists and addicted to their tech, will panic buy the current thing which will be made as appealing as possible. Celebrities and influencers will sell this dystopian bear trap to the masses. With a Hate Speech Bill in place, the chilling effect of owning physical data storage will crash the market for those devices. They will have by that time, 20 years worth of their nostalgic memories stored on the cloud and will have nowhere to download them to. The concept of downloading itself may even become a legacy feature of the internet as far as end users are concerned. At this point, all of your data will be subject to AI trawlers that will flag content on your cloud that is deemed illegal or not inclusive and remove it accordingly. All the while the paperless agenda will be pushed.
All you have to do is google “paperless economy” or “paperless strategy” and you will see an endless sea of global corporations and globalist institution’s websites outlining their paperless plans under the guise of Sustainable Development Goals and the ESG system. You will notice that there are a generous amount of research articles and some of those are straight from the UN and EU. These articles outlines justifications for the removal of paper from the workplace, and by extension the domestic market. The fact that the term “paperless” exists rather than “less paper” is evidence that the end goal is absolutely the removal of paper from domestic, civilian use. Proof of this lies within many documents but here is one I came across from the EU Journal of Sustainable Development Research. In the conclusion the following statement is made:
”there are not many, if any, “actual” obstacles standing in the way of its widespread adoption. It is obvious that those who switch to a paperless system will thrive, while those who do not will either convert when doing so is more expensive and difficult or they will not.”
Expensive and difficult meaning tax and legislation…
Part II to follow.
It will be a cold day in hell before I give up my paper. Pen. My right to use tangible means to communicate.
AI has ZERO place in my life.
Too steeped in my ways.
Too creative. Too artistic to let go of MY PAPER... ITS MINE.
To understand what is happening with AI, it greatly helps to view an Interview with Tucker Carlson and Mike Benz ,a former communication official in the USA Govt. The interview is both revealing and disturbing on a level of Julian Assange Wikileaks and Snowdens Vault7 revelations.
Extract;
Google began as a DARPA grant by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were Stanford PhDs. They got their funding as part of a joint CIA/NSA [US National Security Agency] program to chart how, quote, birds of a feather flock together online through search engine aggregation. One year later, they launched Google and then became a military contractor quickly thereafter. They got Google Maps by purchasing a CIA satellite software, essentially, and the ability to track to use free speech on the internet as a way to circumvent state control over media, over in places like Central Asia, or all around the world, was seen as a way to be able to do Regime changes that used to be done out of CIA station houses or out of embassies or consulates in a way that was totally turbocharged.
Internet free speech technology was initially created by the US national security state. VPNs, virtual private networks and it got away from them for the first few years.
unquote;
The legacy print Media has been exposed as CIA controlled and has lost relevance. They now seek control of the internet using algoritms to control speech ,push agendas, propaganda. rig elections and subvert democracy and free speech.
We have seen how the Irish Regime controls public opinion by. its control of RTE, Local Radio and Newspapers.
It is likely a CIA base is in the US embassy Dublin to maintain control to protect the many US Corporate interests in Ireland thru'Social Media and promoting the compromosed Regime of FF/FG/G
The game is already afoot with the polling on the coming Referendums showing a majrity YES VOTE, which is dubious when compared to the word on the street.