11 Comments
User's avatar
Paddy Early's avatar

Very true✅

To withstand the vicious totalitarian oppression and be willing to push back was fantastic. Sadly for me and for many like me families all around fell for all the lies😭

My own wife left me with an e-mail telling me I was “putting her life in danger”!

But I knew I had no choice but to resist because this is ultimate spiritual warfare totally biblical and we must stay the course✅👊

I ended up in Court 5/6 times for “breaches” but never paid any fines and had a few victories with cases dismissed👍😂

But after such an assault the global criminals have no intention of stopping and all the wars etc are destined to bring about huge hardship and possible total collapse of currencies, food supply etc.

So we can’t rest easy until these vicious Satanic thugs have been jailed and all the assets they have stolen have been taken back👊

Expand full comment
Stephen J. Delaney's avatar

Gut wrenching account but you lead the way to get where we are now.

Expand full comment
William Jeffreys's avatar

I certainly hope you are correct. In spite of all the harms and deaths among those I know personally, no one is yet willing to entertain even the slightest notion the magic medicine had anything to do with it. People took it, died suddenly only days later (one day later in one case), and there is no correlation? Really?

Expand full comment
Paddy Early's avatar

If you e-mail me your address I will post you a booklet I wrote and am distributing; paddyearly@gmail.com

Expand full comment
Bob - Enough's avatar

Good stuff, but where do you get "If you are one of the 7% who resisted the first jab" ... which sounds like a government figure... of utter BS like we HAD in the UK, until the ONS (Office of National statistics) let slip in one of it's clever graphs it was just under 30 %.Maybe not the same elsewhere; but do not believe government BS on face value.

Also your ref to the "Tipping point for large-scale social change? Just 25 percent" - look when it was written ... now this is overestimated by a factor or 4 or 5 .... just saying.

...

Apart from that; brilliant post cheers.

Expand full comment
Stephen J. Delaney's avatar

I used those figures for a reason, both pieces of research validate each other and show that the tipping point was predictable using existing dats science. Their science. They cant debate us when we use their science

Expand full comment
Bob - Enough's avatar

Fair play ...

I only stated my comments by the way from research we did on the old "science" ... trust the science hey ?.... lol

Expand full comment
Stephen J. Delaney's avatar

I don't trust it. But it seems to line up on this occsaion

Expand full comment
Suzy marie klitgaard's avatar

There's a saying m.

Lie three times.

They become convinced it's true.

Anything derived by goverment entities...UN...EU....the rubbish bin fills over flow status.

As a woman, a carer, a worker at one time, now retired and tired of the BS, look to the experiences made. Moving forward to inform others.

Great article my friend

Expand full comment
Doolally's avatar

As someone fortunate enough to have kids and one son in law plus myself who refused to indulge, this article brings me hope that we can beat the atrempts at medical and other totalitarianism, but I still worry. I think most of the 25% minus the original 9% would indulge again, in for example, a bird flu variety🤷‍♀️.

Expand full comment
Stephen J. Delaney's avatar

Maybe so however I believe this generation of people have been adequately soured against the jab industry

Expand full comment