The Rise Of The Whiteletariat

Native working class Europeans are at the end of their tether

“Cardiff Man”

For the last number of decades, civil rights movements have periodically erupted into full scale civil unrest when certain atrocities take place. Rodney King, Stonewall and Bloody Sunday come to mind. Largely speaking, all of these riots were genuine as the extreme political doctrines had yet to overcook these causes into ridiculous illogical outbursts with a view to advancing policy. Organic civil unrest has been absent from the general population for sometime now as the managed news cycles and social engineering online has led to a fake market of victimhood and outrage. Genuine atrocities are largely outside of the governments control and therefore the system will only interact with tragedy objectively when it suits their narrative. This bias has played it’s part in creating a monster as society has descended into sustained upheaval.

The riots after the George Floyd incident were wild. An armed criminal who was an immediate danger to society was challenged by the police and taken to ground. I will state clearly at this point that what followed was clearly a murder. Veteran officer Derek Chauvin was recorded as kneeling on Floyd's neck for 9 minutes and 29 seconds with three other officers forming a ring around him as he did it. No excuse. It was clearly police brutality and they should all suffer for what they did…. however, what followed was a disgrace. Marxist agitators immediately exalted Floyd to minority sainthood, encouraging violence and destruction in his honour despite the fact that he was a dangerous criminal. The Rodney King riots years before had demonstrated the power of mass unrest to the communists of America, and their investors. This was an opportunity to capitalise on a charged event to activate the black community against their political adversaries. The election cycle was conveniently in full swing. The resulting riots led to the deaths of 19 people and caused over a billion dollars in damages. Strangely enough, it made a few millionaires too with Black Lives Matter ultimately being exposed as a racket with luxury homes being purchased and wild consultancy fees being doled out to the inner circle of the group. Like I said, civil rights movements have become completely disingenuous and therefore the riots that follow their agitation are caused in many cases by the State and the NGO complex. This pattern is now changing though and for the better.

Most of the riots in recent times are race riots. An immigrant community, having built up its numbers sufficiently, will emerge onto the streets in a western country, emboldened by modern critical race theory and chauffeured into the hearts and minds of the public by the industrial media complex. The George Floyd protests gave these minority groups an over zealous sense of entitlement and also trained them to take to the streets when the body politic permits it. Political parties like Sinn Fein here at home kneeled in photo shoots with their fists in the air in an attempt to weaponise the African community here into attacking their political opponents. Supported by the relevant NGO’s and left wing parties, large groups of foreigners have taken to the streets to assert their dominance, waiting like a loaded spring for the right story to come along. We have seen this across the continent with the best example recently being the Leeds riots. In Leeds, the riots began because minority children were taken from their parents because of immediate and sustained danger to them from within their own household. The local ethnic groupings came out in force and burned the place to the ground. Their grievance was with the native population and their institutions. How dare we hold them to the same standards as ourselves. The truth is about that incident is tragically embarrassing for those involved. The reason for their riots and the noise was to cover up the fact a baby in the home had suffered a skull fracture and the excuse given by the family was rejected by social services.

It was revealed at this hearing how social services became involved with the family in April, after a baby in their home suffered an unexplained skull fracture.

"Medical opinion is that it is likely that the injury was caused by blunt force trauma or a fall from height, rendering the family's explanation implausible."

In the Leeds instance, the children were about to be trafficked out of the country against a court order and the police acted accordingly. The family were clearly evading the justice system as they were facing certain prosecution and the public embarrassment of having their children taken. The Southport riots on the other hand, were the result of something else entirely. A 17 year old Rwandan boy, who had clearly been indoctrinated into an ideology, presumed to be Islam because of the profile of the attack itself, is the perpetrator in this case. He murdered and maimed innocent little girls indiscriminately in a targeted attack. He knew where he was going. He got a taxi there and failed to pay the driver. It was all decided in advance. It was not a random mental health related outburst. Even if it turns out to be a non religious attack, there is still severely damning evidence that it was ethnic in nature. The perpetrators class mates and others who knew him are reporting that he was expelled from school for possession of a knife and had expressed his desire for a genocide to his peers. Hearsay, sure, but where is confirmation of the truth? under lock and key again? This is why people are up in arms. Western society knows there is a severe difference in behaviour and criminality, even from second generation immigrants never mind the first. They are now refusing to tolerate the silence from the authorities and intimidation of the natives who speak up and point out the obvious.

When it comes to revealing the uncomfortable truth about the propensity of certain cultures to commit acts of violence against children, the white, western world has had enough. In Leeds, foreigners rioted to protect the child abusers from the justice system. In Southport, the natives rioted to protect little children. In Southport, as in Dublin, it was outrage against immoral people from afar and attitudes that they bring with them that drove it. In Leeds on the other hand, it was the protection of immoral cultural attitudes towards children that ignited the people. In Leeds the local minorities all felt afraid that they would be held to the same standard if they allowed the State to intervene on a child safety matter and they acted out in common interest. They screamed racism. In both cases, it is the disgusting degeneracy of foreign people that led to child victims and the ensuing violence.

The difference in sincerity between the recent riots in the UK are night and day. The Dublin Riot matches the same logical flow: a gut-wrenching atrocity against the innocent children of natives occurs, followed by the immediate explosion of raw emotion from those who are refusing to accept this as normal. The similarity in the disposition of the Gael and the Brit in the face of barbarianism is synchronistic yet organic. It comes in large part from shared western values but also from other influences such as Christianity, post-christian atheism and I will say it, genetic disposition and good rearing. Our countries are being flooded with the end product of third world parenting. Occidental parenting and moral teachings in the west are competing with the failures of these birth tourists as unloved, child benefit producing anchor babies are injected into our children’s classrooms, sports clubs and social circles. They are bringing the trauma and the depravity of the third world with them as organised machete fights, substance abuse and sexual assaults ensue, generation after generation. We remain silent out of politeness and fear of reprisal as we await the inevitable time bomb.

There is accumulating evidence to suggest that there are genetic influences on the conventional personality dimensions, attachment style, cognitive empathy, behaviour in sexual relationships, and engagement with wider social networks (Chen and Johnson 2012; Costa et al. 2009; Denes 2015; Lee Raby et al. 2013; Lo et al. 2017; Lucht et al. 2013; Pearce et al. 2017; Rodrigues et al. 2009; Schneiderman et al. 2014; Walum et al. 2008, 2012; Way et al. 2009; Wu et al. 2016). Moreover, personality also seems to be affected by genetic variation, having a relatively high heritability (Jang et al. 1996; Kim et al. 2013; Power and Pluess 2015; Vukasović and Bratko 2015; Yamagata et al. 2006). A number of studies have identified potential candidate genes underlying individual variation in personality (Carver et al. 2015; de Moor et al. 2012; Eisenberg et al. 2007; Hamidovic et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2013; Lo et al. 2017; Lukaszewski and Roney 2011; Varga et al. 2012). Overall, there is strong evidence of a genetic basis for personality variation, as well as other aspects of disposition (attachment style and sociocognitive capacities), sociosexual behaviour and sociality beyond dyadic interactions (see Pearce et al. 2017).

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-019-00120-5

The genetic underpinning of behaviour is well documented and researched but like many other fields of science, findings that run contrary to the ascendant ideological dogma are seen as weeds in the garden and dosed accordingly. Unfortunately, we have had this debate forced upon us. We didn’t ask to to talk about these things, we don’t particularly want them to be true, but they are. I don’t regard myself as a racist, and many of my foreign born friends will attest to that, but under no circumstances will I surrender an inch of my way of life for fear of offending a different tribe. One might argue that the Irish man is genetically predisposed to that position given the experiences of those who have tried to subjugate us. The genetic disposition argument against mass immigration is gaining momentum every day with a substantial number of attacks now involving long term residents and second or third generation immigrants as the culprits. Much of the reason for this is the parallel society effect, which is essentially minorities grouping together and occupying entire streets and neighbourhoods therefore reinforcing all that is good and bad about their culture but this does not account for all of it. The science behind genetic disposition is in. The science around tribalism and multi-culturalism is also in. There is not a single multicultural society on earth that is devoid of ethnic gangs and disparate crime rates along the lines of race. The only answer the open borders utopians have to this inconvenient truth is to bury these outcomes under an avalanche of anti-nativist social policy.

Institutionalised equity is throttling of the native people of Europe in order to synthesise the appearance of integration. The shortcomings of outside cultures are incentivised by the underserving of the native dominant groups. Underserving in this case means a whole host of evil eugenic and imperialist practices including targeted population control measures. We tell Irish women that it is too expensive to have to have children while simultaneously affording immigrants the right to sponsor up to five family members to come here on full state supports. Surely we can tell Irish women that we will sponsor their first 5 children? Surely in the event that an Irish woman doesn’t want to produce children because of economic pressure alone, we can affirm her recently defended right under Article 41.2 to have the full support of the state? I say we should, at an absolute minimum, advertise our willingness to support the procreation of Irish families as enthusiastically as we offer these Cromwellian sponsorships to outsiders.

This is just one of the many peculiarities that add up in the minds of the disaffected white working class, who cherish their history, their culture and their sense of ownership of Ireland, and indeed they feel the same in the UK, Germany, France, Spain, Portugal, Netherlands etc. In Ireland and England in particular, we have a close relationship. There is a shared identity that has been formed through years of clashing swords and exchanging gunfire with each other. In particular the working class Brit and the Working class Fenian are now engaged in a mutual battle with this global force for change. As children are stabbed here, there and everywhere in the face of unyielding State apathy, the most marginalised section of Irish and British society have settled on the realisation that it is now time to fight.

This new white proletariat carries with it the label of “far-right” however this is known to be part of the attack against us. Engaged in self defence, The Whiteletariat are now unwavering in the face of this demonisation and ostracisation by the woke liberal hive mind. We are no longer seeking the approval of the middle ground through the avenue of optics. We are not seeking approval at all in fact because we already have it. We have the support of the masses whether they admit it or not. According to the latest Red C Poll, 72% of Ireland believes we should have strict immigration laws. According to that same poll, 22% believe we are being ethnically replaced. Sure, the worker ants clap like seals along with the rituals of state worship but only because there is a gun to their head and they resent that fact. They are just as angry as we are and are now at the stage of riots because they have turned the other cheek again and again and again.