Kingston Shills.

Kingston Mills' science fiction statements in an RTE article were too much for me to take.

Lab Rat Mills

I normally stay out of the covid debate now that the narrative has collapsed as I feel we have won it. There are better people than I involved now in terms of doctors, scientists and statisticians who are chasing this boogey man away in the most professional, methodical way possible. I feel that my resistance to the religiosity of covid is as strong as ever but the methods I used early doors to wake people up would be ineffective now that we have hit peak awareness. One of my greatest strengths by this measure is waking people up to the looming narratives so what I am about to talk about now, a gripe that I have in respect to Big Pharma shill, Kingston Mills, is going to be a departure from my usual philosophy in regards to what I spend my time on. The RTE article, as mentioned in the subtitle, is too rich to ignore.

Mills was one of the go to “experts” during covid who would simulate the existence of a field of excellence in which he resided in, and, was regularly an active participant in in regards to examining and researching these strands of covid that he was signalling alarm about. Mills subscribes, clearly, to the doctrine of “trust the science” and has all of the badges to prove it. His career is a myriad of accolades and titles that have thrown at his feet since he was a boy. Fellowship after fellowship has been granted to him and his name has been associated with many, many studies and pieces of research. Mills, if his CV is anything to go by, is a yes man in the extreme sense. He has been under the WHO’s control since at least 1996 officially but was more than likely on their radar from his young days for his ability to regurgitate the rehearsed sales pitches of Big Pharma. I would wager a bet that Mills is extremely knowledgable of the source material that he uses to lie and twist into terrifying medical fiction in order to drive the vaccination panic here. He has demonstrated this on many occasions. This particular op-ed however, particularly in the aftermath of the implosion of the covid narrative is as callous and malintented as it gets.

The article in question has no author attributed to it and speaks about Mills’ comments in the third person, insinuating it is not him that wrote it. Who approached who? When did he make the comments, doesn’t matter right? This article is clearly a government mandated article, compulsorily written under contract from the Department of Health and the details of the claims made Mills given the benefit of the doubt and present fact via the ‘Appeal to Authority’ fallacy. Blah blah blah, an expert has said etc, etc, etc.

A new variant of Covid-19 is "more transmissible" than previous strains of the virus, an expert has said.

The article shamelessly, and predictably follows the same blueprint as previous attempts to shill the jab.

New variant bad, old jab bad, new jab better, because “data”, ad nauseam.

Kingston Mills, Professor of Experimental Immunology at Trinity College Dublin, explained that the new variant is a "sub-variant of a sub-variant of Omicron" which was first seen two winters ago.

He told RTÉ's Drivetime: "This one is even more transmissible than previous ones and has more changes in its structure from the previous variants.

"So, it makes it more difficult for the antibodies that are generated with the vaccines to protect against it."

However, data suggests that the latest version of the vaccine will protect against it, Prof Mills added.

He said: "I think the issue is that going forward we are going to have a series of variants emerging each year like we had with flu.

This particular fallacy is the device upon which the governments around the world coerced the unsuspecting flock into the slaughter houses that were vaccine centres and it is so in your face in this article it has to be highlighted. For the most part the article is standard vaccine propaganda, focused around the mergence of a new variant which is always more transmissible, inevitably establishing the requirement for regular, permanent use of their product. This is where Mills loses the run of himself. Mills stands on ceremony and plays with his food by also providing an unnecessary, illogical explanation for this along with an unsupported claim that long-covid is real:

Prof Mills said with the arrival of Omicron and its sub-variants, infections tended to become more confined to the upper respiratory tract, the throat rather than the lungs.

"It still can cause serious disease especially when it leaves the respiratory tract, and the issue of long Covid is still real and can persist for many months after clearing the infection," he said.

The virus, he said, becomes less disease-causing but more transmissible.

"It is in the interest of the virus to keep the host alive, so that it can transmit more readily to others," he added.

Where do I start? Well first of all I need to explain long-covid to the reader, and unlike Mills and the anonymous author of the article, I will reference this. Long Covid is not a real, unique or standalone condition. Long Covid is a rebranding of already existing and understood generic complaints, post sickness, that relies on the addition of extremely generous timeframes and vague, nondescript symptoms that potentially place every single person under its auspices, and by extension, perpetual consideration of the jab. The proof the long covid should be dismissed as rubbish lies within the medical field itself. Long Covid was such a good, omnipresent boogey man that it brought with it the threat of an ever present excuse for the labour force to abstain from their duties. This opportunity is/was particularly enticing to the same attention seeking Covidians that masturbated over their vaccine passports on social media as they engaged/engage in hypochondri-activism.

This seems to have been a bridge too far for the more scientifically minded … scientists … who have pushed back on this nonsense. Also the HR industrial complex had a thing or two to say about this get out of work free card. The consumerist overlords had their G-men in the dail specifically NOT recognise Long Covid as an “occupational illness”, much to Denis Naughton’s disappointment in order to prevent this double-edged fabrication from hitting them on the return stroke. They say hunger is a great sauce, well the need to keep cheap labour on the production line can remove any hazard, fictional or actual, from the equation and there is no greater hunger than that. The danger, the ‘suffering’ of those under the grips of long Covid, seems purely to be nothing more than a narrative that these clowns are using as a boogeyman to drive vaccine uptake and those now regimented hypochondriacs are ready to line up and announce their self diagnoses. After all, the incentive to do it is regular time off and approval from state and its media. All of this ever more heinous when you realise that the medical field is aware of this nonsense and has dismissed it entirely. Mills’ enabling of this irrational fear of regular, minor complaints by gathering these expected side effects of the human condition under one umbrella, and then immediately pitching a product that has absolutely nothing to do with the treatment of these complaints, is in my opinion enough to get the man arrested and charged criminally and his licence and titles stripped. At the very least he should be removed from the information pipeline of state funded, matter of fact media. But it does not end there.

The article reaches its sado-masochist crescendo when Mills indulges in his fetish of mocking the public and makes a claim about the virus that adds up to self awareness. Mills states:

"It is in the interest of the virus to keep the host alive, so that it can transmit more readily to others," he added.

This paints a picture in the minds of the reader that this new variant is somehow knowingly keeping us alive while it hugs our face like in the movie Alien. It is aware of itself, and has the power to end our lives at will and if we don’t take the jab it will burst out of our chest and attack somebody else. This hyperbolic, unscientific personification of what is essentially a protein, not even considered to be a single/multi-celled organism, is a direct attempt to create a Stephen King novel inside the minds of those who don’t know any different. Mills is a scumbag for this, on top of everything else he has done to undermine the bodily integrity and trust of the general public. The entire field of medical science is predicated upon the ideas and asseverations of these absolute Walter Mitty’s and we need to start educating ourselves on their schemes and challenging them.

This article explicitly states that this new variant, JN.1, is a sub-variant of a sub-variant of Omicron ( itself a sub-variant of Sars-Cov-2 ). Sars-Cov-2 is an upper respiratory disease. What Kingston Shills and his propagandist overlords forgot to check before they came out with this nonsense, is that the list of JN.1 symptoms focuses on stomach illness and pain.

• Gastrointestinal problems such as pain in the abdomen, bloating and diarrhoea

• Headache and body aches

• Sore throat

• Runny nose

• Fatigue

• Loss of appetite

• Fever 

• Cough

What you are witnessing here is an expansion of the parameters of what is considered to be covid, to any list of symptoms that is prevalent that given flu season. Rather than sticking to the existing seasonal virus science, which is that there are multiple, distinguishable ( at a DNA level remember ) viruses that have varying levels of virulency and efficacy, into a new religion of mono-theistic, all powerful mono-virus complete with the sacrament of vaccination that we must all line up and take like the body of Christ. We are witnessing a crusade like event in the field of medical science. The new crusaders are not knights, but rather eugenicists in pursuit of their holy land, full mandatory genome intervention. Their new Zion? The removal of the natural selection, natural birth, natural death and indeed a natural life.

Mills entire career has been set up in the very same fashion that modern superstar boxers enjoy. They are put up against journeymen for 20 or so fights, given platforms to espouse delusions of grandeur and claim that dismemberment and death awaits their next opponent. Mills is now in the ring with seasoned researchers, scientists who have abandoned the WHO nipple and an alternative media that has been training relentlessly for this fight. The crowd is no longer chanting his name or subscribing to his premium content, nor are they excited about his ring walk. We are pacing the canvas with our teeth clenched ready to body this cunt and his false sense of security has him jogging towards the ring in silence as the crowd knows, or at the very least hopes, he will meet his maker. His supporters are confined to a small section of the corporate box, some of them already betting against him and whispering the names of young prospects who can replace him. The ref even looks nervous.